The Use of VAR and Interpretation of Incidents Become Subjective and Doubtful
The use of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology in Tunisian football has become a subject of controversy, with many questioning its effectiveness in ensuring fairness and equity in the game. Instead of providing a solution, VAR has complicated matters, sparking debates and fueling tensions.
A Controversial Derby
The recent Tunisian derby between CA and EST is a case in point. The match was marred by controversy, with the CA team protesting two incidents that were not treated by the VAR. One incident in particular has raised eyebrows: a handball by Ben Ali on a shot by Sghaïer. The defender's hand was not in a natural position, and the ball was heading towards the goal. While it is debatable whether it was a penalty or not, what is surprising is the attitude of the referee, Amir Loucif, and his VAR team.
Questionable Decision-Making
Loucif did not consult the VAR to make a decision, despite the incident being in his line of sight. The VAR team, on the other hand, took over a minute to decide that it was not a penalty. This contradictory attitude has raised more questions than answers. Why did Loucif not consult the VAR, and how did the VAR team come to their decision so quickly?
A Lack of Consistency
The use of VAR in Tunisian football has been plagued by inconsistency. The technology is not used uniformly, and different incidents are treated differently. This has led to a lack of trust in the system, with many feeling that it is biased towards certain teams. The material and image quality used for VAR are also questionable, with some arguing that they are not up to par with other Arab championships.
A Subjective Tool
The VAR has become a subjective tool, used to manipulate incidents and favor certain teams. This has led to a loss of credibility in the championship, with many feeling that the system is rigged. The reason is simple: the VAR is not managed with equity and transparency. The same director has had a monopoly on VAR for years, despite the availability of better technology and material in other championships.
A Missed Opportunity
The Tunisian referee has missed an opportunity to shine and prove himself. Instead, he has reinforced the perception that the CAF and FIFA are right to ignore him. The head of referees in Tunisia, Jamel Himoudi, has also lost credibility since his arrival. His antics, errors, and choices have not inspired confidence, and he is far from being the person to restore trust in the Tunisian referee.
A Call for Change
The use of VAR in Tunisian football needs to be re-examined. The system needs to be managed with equity and transparency, and the material and image quality need to be improved. Only then can the championship regain its credibility, and the VAR can become a useful tool in ensuring fairness and equity in the game.
