US Bill Targeting Tunisia Reignites Debate on Interference and Double Standards in Human Rights
The proposed US bill, titled "Restoring Democracy in Tunisia," has sparked controversy, as it appears to punish Tunisia for its unwavering support of Palestine, while other, more compliant states, escape criticism. The initiative is believed to be influenced by pressure from the Zionist lobby on the international stage.
Questioning US Motives
Do the United States want to see extremists and terrorists take over Tunisia? Where were they when terrorism was crippling the economy and stifling fundamental freedoms? Where were they when Tunisia was mourning its martyrs among the military and security forces? And where were they when our country was stigmatized as one of the main suppliers of terrorists in the world? Do the United States want to plunge Tunisia back into chaos?
Tunisia's Response
In the face of these questions and the evident interference, Tunisia has not remained passive. The reaction was immediate. MP Besma Hammami announced that the Parliament would prepare an initiative to "restore American democracy" as of next October, thus affirming national sovereignty and reminding that the Tunisian people will not accept any lessons in democracy.
A Long History of Interference
For the Echaâb movement, this project is part of a long tradition of US interference in the Middle East, from Syria to Iraq, via Libya and Sudan. Echaâb calls for the creation of a national progressive front to defend Tunisian sovereignty, improve the socio-economic situation, and build a democratic model faithful to the aspirations of the people.
Contrasting US Policies
The contrast with US internal policy is striking. Former President Barack Obama recently denounced human rights violations in the United States: intimidation of universities, pressure on the judiciary, and repression of freedom of expression. These violations would be deemed unacceptable on American soil but are imposed on other countries under the guise of promoting democracy.
Double Standards
On one hand, Washington demands democracy and respect for human rights; on the other, it pressures states that refuse to abandon their principles, particularly their support for Palestine. In the background, the emergence of a new world order that challenges American supremacy can also be observed. This blatant double standard shows that human rights are applied selectively, according to geopolitical interests and international pressures.
A Potential Opportunity for Tunisia
In the face of this attempt at pressure, Tunisia could emerge stronger. The US bill, far from weakening the country, could consolidate its determination to build an authentic democratic model, resistant to sanctions and external lessons, while reaffirming its solidarity with oppressed peoples, particularly those of Gaza.
A Final Reminder
Finally, it is worth recalling that the majority of UN experts believe that the United States does not set an example in terms of respect for human rights. This is evidenced by the joint condemnation by 79 UN countries of the latest US sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC).
